Skip to main content

CHAPTER 7: Flow Control

Review of variables

Variables may be manipulated by assigning or changing values with the expressions =, +=, -=, ++, --. Those expressions may be combined with the expressions -, +, *, /, %. However, so far, you have only been shown how to use a function to do these in a linear way. For example:

int hello(int x) {
  x--;
  write("Hello, x is "+x+".\n");
  return x;
}

is a function you should know how to write and understand. But what if you wanted to write the value of x only if x = 1? Or what if you wanted it to keep writing x over and over until x = 1 before returning? LPC uses flow control in exactly the same way as C and C++.

The LPC flow control statements

LPC uses the following expressions:

if(expression) instruction;

if(expression) instruction;
else instruction;

if(expression) instruction;
else if(expression) instruction;
else instruction;

while(expression) instruction;

do { instruction; } while(expression);

switch(expression) {
  case (expression): instruction; break;
  default: instruction;
}

Before we discuss these, first something on what is meant by expression and instruction. An expression is anything with a value like a variable, a comparison (like x>5, where if x is 6 or more, the value is 1, else the value is 0), or an assignment(like x += 2). An instruction can be any single line of lpc code like a function call, a value assignment or modification, etc.

You should know also the operators &&, ||, ==, !=, and !. These are the logical operators. They return a nonzero value when true, and 0 when false.

Make note of the values of the following expressions:

(1 && 1) value: 1 (1 and 1)

(1 && 0) value: 0 (1 and 0)

(1 || 0) value: 1 (1 or 0)

(1 == 1) value: 1 (1 is equal to 1)

(1 != 1) value: 0 (1 is not equal to 1)

(!1) value: 0 (not 1)

(!0) value: 1 (not 0)

In expressions using &&, if the value of the first item being compared is 0, the second is never tested even. When using ||, if the first is true (1), then the second is not tested.

if()

The first expression to look at that alters flow control is if(). Take a look at the following example:

1 void reset() {
2 int x;
3
4 ::reset();
5 x = random(10);
6 if(x > 50) set_search_func("floorboards", "search_floor");
7 }

The line numbers are for reference only.

In line 2, of course we declare a variable of type int called x.

Line 3 is aethetic whitespace to clearly show where the declarations end and the function code begins. The variable x is only available to the function reset().

Line 4 makes a call to the room.c version of reset().

Line 5 uses the driver efun random() to return a random number between 0 and the parameter minus 1. So here we are looking for a number between 0 and 99.

In line 6, we test the value of the expression (x>50) to see if it is true or false. If it is true, then it makes a call to the room.c function set_search_func(). If it is false, the call to set_search_func() is never executed.

In line 7, the function returns driver control to the calling function (the driver itself in this case) without returning any value.

If you had wanted to execute multiple instructions instead of just the one, you would have done it in the following manner:

if(x>50) {
  set_search_func("floorboards", "search_floor");
  if(!present("beggar", this_object())) make_beggar();
}

Notice the {} encapsulate the instructions to be executed if the test expression is true. In the example, again we call the room.c function which sets a function (search_floor()) that you will later define yourself to be called when the player types "search floorboards" (NOTE: This is highly mudlib dependent. Nightmare mudlibs have this function call.

Others may have something similar, while others may not have this feature under any name). Next, there is another if() expression that tests the truth of the expression (!present("beggar",this_object())). The ! in the test expression changes the truth of the expression which follows it. In this case, it changes the truth of the efun present(), which will return the object that is a beggar if it is in the room (this_object()), or it will return 0 if there is no beggar in the room. So if there is a beggar still living in the room, (present("beggar", this_object())) will have a value equal to the beggar object (data type object), otherwise it will be 0. The ! will change a 0 to a 1, or any nonzero value (like the beggar object) to a 0. Therefore, the expression (!present("beggar", this_object())) is true if there is no beggar in the room, and false if there is. So, if there is no beggar in the room, then it calls the function you define in your room code that makes a new beggar and puts it in the room. (If there is a beggar in the room, we do not want to add yet another one :))

Of course, if()'s often comes with ands or buts :). In LPC, the formal reading of the if() statement is:

if(expression) { set of intructions }
else if(expression) { set of instructions }
else { set of instructions }

This means:

If expression is true, then do these instructions.

Otherise, if this second expression is true, do this second set.

And if none of those were true, then do this last set.

You can have if() alone:

if(x>5) write("Foo,\n");

with an else if():

if(x > 5) write("X is greater than 5.\n");
else if(x >2) write("X is less than 6, but greater than 2.\n");

with an else:

if(x>5) write("X is greater than 5.\n");
else write("X is less than 6.\n");

or the whole lot of them as listed above. You can have any number of else if()'s in the expression, but you must have one and only one if() and at most one else. Of course, as with the beggar example, you may nest if() statements inside if() instructions. (For example,

if(x>5) {
  if(x==7) write("Lucky number!\n");
  else write("Roll again.\n");
} else write("You lose.\n");

The statements: while() and do {} while()

Prototype:

while(expression) { set of instructions }
do { set of instructions } while(expression);

These allow you to create a set of instructions which continue to execute so long as some expression is true. Suppose you wanted to set a variable equal to a player's level and keep subtracting random amounts of either money or hp from a player until that variable equals 0 (so that player's of higher levels would lose more). You might do it this way:

1 int x;
2
3 x = (int)this_player()->query_level(); /* this has yet to be explained */
4 while(x > 0) {
5 if(random(2)) this_player()->add_money("silver", -random(50));
6 else this_player()->add_hp(-(random(10));
7 x--;
8 }

The expression this_player()->query_level() calIn line 4, we start a loop that executes so long as x is greater than 0.

Another way we could have done this line would be:

while(x) {

The problem with that would be if we later made a change to the funtion y anywhere between 0 and 49 coins.

In line 6, if instead it returns 0, we call the add_hp() function in the player which reduces the player's hit points anywhere between 0 and 9 hp.

In line 7, we reduce x by 1.

At line 8, the execution comes to the end of the while() instructions and goes back up to line 4 to see if x is still greater than 0. This loop will keep executing until x is finally less than 1.

You might, however, want to test an expression after you execute some instructions. For instance, in the above, if you wanted to execute the instructions at least once for everyone, even if their level is below the test level:

int x;
x = (int)this_player()->query_level();
do {
if(random(2)) this_player()->add_money("silver", -random(50));
else this_player()->add_hp(-random(10));
x--;
} while(x > 0);

This is a rather bizarre example, being as few muds have level 0 players. And even still, you could have done it using the original loop with a different test. Nevertheless, it is intended to show how a do{} while() works. As you see, instead of initiating the test at the beginning of the loop (which would immediately exclude some values of x), it tests after the loop has been executed. This assures that the instructions of the loop get executed at least one time, no matter what x is.

for() loops

Prototype:

for(initialize values ; test expression ; instruction) { instructions }

initialize values:

This allows you to set starting values of variables which will be used in the loop. This part is optional.

test expression:

Same as the expression in if() and while(). The loop is executed as long as this expression (or expressions) is true. You must have a test expression.

instruction:

An expression (or expressions) which is to be executed at the end of each loop. This is optional.

Note:

for(;expression;) {}

IS EXACTLY THE SAME AS

while(expression) {}

Example:

1 int x;
2
3 for(x= (int)this_player()->query_level(); x>0; x--) {
4 if(random(2)) this_player()->add_money("silver", -random(50));
5 else this_player()->add_hp(-random(10));
6 }

This for() loop behaves EXACTLY like the while() example. Additionally, if you wanted to initialize 2 variables:

for(x=0, y=random(20); x<y; x++) { write(x+"\n"); }

Here, we initialize 2 variables, x and y, and we separate them by a comma. You can do the same with any of the 3 parts of the for() expression.

The statement: switch()

Prototype:

switch(expression) {
case constant: instructions
case constant: instructions
...
case constant: instructions
default: instructions
}

This is functionally much like if() expressions, and much nicer to the CPU, however most rarely used because it looks so damn complicated.

But it is not.

First off, the expression is not a test. The cases are tests. A English sounding way to read:

1 int x;
2
3 x = random(5);
4 switch(x) {
5 case 1: write("X is 1.\n");
6 case 2: x++;
7 default: x--;
8 }
9 write(x+"\n");

is:

set variable x to a random number between 0 and 4. In case 1 of variable x write its value add 1 to it and subtract 1. In case 2 of variable x, add 1 to its value and then subtract 1. In other cases subtract 1. Write the value of x. switch(x) basically tells the driver that the variable x is the value we are trying to match to a case.

Once the driver finds a case which matches, that case and all following cases will be acted upon. You may break out of the switch statement as well as any other flow control statement with a break instruction in order only to execute a single case. But that will be explained later. The default statement is one that will be executed for any value of x so long as the switch() flow has not been broken. You may use any data type in a switch statement:

string name;
name = (string)this_player()->query_name();
switch(name) {
  case "descartes": write("You borg.\n");
  case "flamme":
  case "forlock":
  case "shadowwolf": write("You are a Nightmare head arch.\n");
  default: write("You exist.\n");
}

For me, I would see:

You borg.
You are a Nightmare head arch.
You exist.

Flamme, Forlock, or Shadowwolf would see:

You are a Nightmare head arch.
You exist.

Everyone else would see:

You exist.

Altering the flow of functions and flow control statements

The following instructions:

return continue break

alter the natural flow of things as described above.

return

No matter where it occurs in a function, will cease the execution of that function and return control to the function which called the one the return statement is in. If the function is NOT of type void, then a value must follow the return statement, and that value must be of a type matching the function. An absolute value function would look like this:

int absolute_value(int x) {
  if(x>-1) return x;
  else return -x;
}

In the second line, the function ceases execution and returns to the calling function because the desired value has been found if x is a positive number.

continue

This is most often used in for() and while statements. It serves to stop the execution of the current loop and send the execution back to the beginning of the loop. For instance, say you wanted to avoid division by 0:

x= 4;
while( x > -5) {
  x--
  if(!x) continue;
  write((100/x)+"\n");
}
write("Done.\n")

You would see the following output:

33
50
100
-100
-50
-33
-25
Done.

To avoid an error, it checks in each loop to make sure x is not 0. If x is zero, then it starts back with the test expression without finishing its current loop.

In a for() expression

for(x=3; x>-5; x--) {
  if(!x) continue;
  write((100/x)+"\n");
}
write("Done.\n");

It works much the same way. Note this gives exactly the same output as before. At x=1, it tests to see if x is zero, it is not, so it writes 100/x, then goes back to the top, subtracts one from x, checks to see if it is zero again, and it is zero, so it goes back to the top and subtracts 1 again.

break

This one ceases the function of a flow control statement. No matter where you are in the statement, the control of the program will go to the end of the loop. So, if in the above examples, we had used break instead of continue, the output would have looked like this:

33
50
100
Done.

continue is most often used with the for() and while() statements. break however is mostly used with switch()

switch(name) {
  case "descartes": write("You are borg.\n"); break;
  case "flamme": write("You are flamme.\n"); break;
  case "forlock": write("You are forlock.\n"); break;
  case "shadowwolf": write("You are shadowwolf.\n"); break;
  default: write("You will be assimilated.\n");
}

This functions just like:

if(name == "descartes") write("You are borg.\n");
else if(name == "flamme") write("You are flamme.\n");
else if(name == "forlock") write("You are forlock.\n");
else if(name == "shadowwolf") write("You are shadowwolf.\n");
else write("You will be assimilated.\n");

except the switch statement is much better on the CPU.

If any of these are placed in nested statements, then they alter the flow of the most immediate statement.

Chapter summary

This chapter covered one hell of a lot, but it was stuff that needed to be seen all at once. You should now completely understand if() for() while() do{} while() and switch(), as well as how to alter their flow using return, continue, and break. Efficiency says if it can be done in a natural way using switch() instead of a lot of if() else if()'s, then by all means do it. You were also introduced to the idea of calling functions in other objects. That however, is a topic to be detailed later.

You now should be completely at ease writing simple rooms (if you have read your mudlib's room building document), simple monsters, and other sorts of simple objects.